The answer is: Ishbosheth

2 Sam 2:8-11 - Even though Saul had died David still wasn't able to become king of Israel

After David was anointed king of Judah, Ishbosheth took the throne in Israel, a critical moment in the fractured history following Saul's reign. To put this into perspective, Ishbosheth was Saul's son and was propped up by Abner, Saul's former commander. When David was crowned king in Hebron, it marked the beginning of two kingdoms grappling for power, which ultimately led to civil strife.

This narrative illustrates the complexity of leadership even when a rightful king is chosen. Even after Saul's death, the shadow of his kingship lingered. It's intriguing to note that Ishbosheth's short reign lasted only two years. His rule was significant yet characterized by instability and division—clearly, not all leadership is enacted by rightful authority or met with acceptance.

There’s also an interesting connection in this context; just as David was seen as a shepherd before becoming king, his rise metaphorically represents the path of many leaders discussed throughout scripture, drawing excluding figures like Moses who initially resisted their roles. Moreover, consider the mention of Hebron, where David’s kingship was solidified. Surrounded by the hills of Judah, Hebron was a traditional town of the patriarchs—Abraham himself having garnered a sizable legacy there, adding depth to David's claim and purpose.

The establishment of two separate rule under Ishbosheth exemplifies the turmoil that existed in God's plan, leading ultimately to David becoming the unified king of Israel, symbolizing an impending reconciliation theme throughout Biblical history. Isn’t it remarkable how these stories interweave to show divine providence manifest even in society's political turmoils?