The answer is: Ishbosheth

2 Sam 2:8-11 - Even though Saul had died David still wasn't able to become king of Israel

After Saul's death, the political landscape in ancient Israel was anything but smooth! While David was anointed king of Judah, Ishbosheth—a son of Saul—seized the throne of Israel. It’s a classic tale of power struggles that might remind us of Greek tragedies, but it’s also filled with interesting dynamics about leadership and loyalty.

Now, Ishbosheth wasn’t a natural leader like David. Strikingly, he appears to shy away from the grip of power and wicked machinations around him, relying more on the influence of Abner, Saul's mighty general, to keep him propped up. This illustrates that sometimes a ruler's strength does not come from the crown they wear but from the people who back them.

The division of the kingdoms serves as a snapshot of a nation grappling with its identity post-monarchy. Did you know that the name "Ishbosheth" even means "man of shame"—which might hint he wasn't exactly the people’s favorite? Meanwhile, the name “David” signifies "beloved." Such contrasting titles not just reflect their personalities but also tie back to their divine purposes.

While episodes from this struggle unfold, they echo the complicated nature of leadership even today. When you think about McKellor’s comment on leadership in churches and communities today, it highlights a fundamental truth: True leadership stems from love, unity, and respect—something David would future exemplify with his reign! Through these tales, we're invited to ponder the deeper meanings of authority and affection in leadership, giving us cues on how we can cultivate these traits in our own lives.