The answer is: Father-in-law

John 18:13

In the context of the Gospel of John, the connection between Annas and Caiaphas opens a fascinating window into the Jewish leadership structure of the time. Annas served as the high priest before Caiaphas, his son-in-law, clad in power near the crest of the first century’s religious turmoil. Although Caiaphas is the high priest during Jesus’ trial, the influence of Annas lingered like an unshakeable legacy due to his considerable sway and prestige.

Fun fact: Annas is often viewed as a sort of “power behind the throne.” Despite being deposed by the Romans, he wasn't completely sidelined, making him a pivotal figure—think of him as the puppet master! Interestingly, this nuanced family connection—father-in-law to son-in-law—illustrates how inherited power often replicates social hierarchies, much like in many cultures today.

Moreover, the practice of bringing Jesus before both Annas and Caiaphas showcases the complexity of the trial. Annas was a precedent authority, so it’s no wonder they wanted both perspectives before turning to the Roman authorities. These personal ties in the leadership reveal a familial loyalty that often conflicted with the burgeoning tensions among religious and secular authorities.

When you study John, it’s unveiling to realize how relationships and familial links shaped the narrative. The New Testament is brimming with such dynamic connections, adding havoc and drama to the unfolding story of early Christianity.